About terezakis

http://www.terezakis.com/bio.html “Peter is a dedicated artist, whose work draws on and contributes to the history of art and technology.” — Edward Shanken, Ph.D. researcher, Duke University ".... Peter Terezakis' light installation powerfully suggests heat lightning fragmenting the desert's night air...." — Jennifer Dunning, The New York Times "Peter Terezakis's soulfully technological art exemplifies the struggles between the ideal and the real, the still living questions at the heart of our post-modern civilization." — Alex Grey " Peter Terezakis' "participatory environments" resemble remnants or artifacts left by a future culture rediscovered." — Alice Hutchison, Curator, Sensory Overdrive “Peter Terezakis has developed a remarkable body of work over 30 years, which investigates the use technology in innovative ways to create art works of vision, spirit and arresting beauty. Early work in electronic jewelry, participatory environments and interactive installations that delightfully engaged the viewer with sculptures activating light and sound, has expanded to environmental art that extends his poetic vision across vast landscapes. His large scale performative events such as Sacred Sky, Sacred Earth, bring together large communities (over 1000 spectators), focusing awareness on the fragile environment and the power of artistic creation. In our collaborative work in dance and theatre, he has worked tirelessly (with patience and humor) and achieved wonders in adverse conditions, such as interactive site specific installations in Greece, Latvia, Mexico, Romania, and the Slovak Republic, to the first telematic projection of an off-site actor into an actual waterfall created in a theatre. He is the rare artist with a spiritual vision, a deep knowledge of the history and context of the field of art and technology, and the engineering expertise to personally build all of his creations successfully. I support his work with my highest recommendation.” — Allyson Green, Chair, Department of Theatre and Dance, University of California, San Diego "Sacred Sky, Sacred Earth offered a mystic experience that fed the senses and made one feel a true part of this world." — Lori Bledsoe, The Alpine Sun Peter Terezakis' work defies category. His unique photography and lighting installations are a seamless blend of craft and technology within an organic context and creative vision that reveals an elegant visual composer. As scenic elements they are rich and moving. His graphic and Web design is crisp, graceful, imaginative and accessible. As an educator, Peter's broad expertise is reassuring and clarifying and delivered with a contagious enthusiasm. I have repeatedly incorporated samples of Peter's work into my own curriculum as an example of innovative and relevant design. As a collaborator, working with Peter has been rewarding, generative, and motivating. His generous spirit is reflected in his dedication an openness. I look forward the next opportunity to experience the wealth of Peter's artistry. — Tom Ontiveros, Assistant Professor, University of Southern California “Peter is a uniquely talented artist, and a pioneer in the Art-Sci (art & science) movement. He always managed to pull off the projects he proposed, no matter how amazing they sounded in his project proposals.” — Flash Light, Artist and Board Member, Art and Science Collaborations, Inc. (ASCI) "Terezakis marries art and technology in a unique visual quest for spiritual engagement." — Allyson Grey

Exxon oil spill cleanup ongoing in Arkansas

 MAYFLOWER, Ark./HOUSTON | Mon Apr 1, 2013 6:58pm EDT  (Reuters) - Exxon Mobil Corp continued efforts on Monday to clean up thousands of barrels of heavy Canadian crude oil spilled from a near 65-year-old pipeline in Arkansas, as a debate raged about the safety of transporting rising volumes of the fuel into the United States.  The Pegasus pipeline, which ruptured in a housing development near the town of Mayflower on Friday, spewing oil across lawns and down residential streets, remained shut and a company spokesman declined to speculate about when it would be fixed and restarted.  Exxon, which was fined in 2010 for not inspecting another portion of the Pegasus line with sufficient frequency, had yet to excavate the area around the Pegasus pipeline breach on Monday, a critical step in assessing damage and determining how and why it leaked.

Exxon oil spill cleanup ongoing in Arkansas, pipeline shut

One drop of oil will “contaminate approximately 75,000 gallons of water- the size of an Olympic swimming pool.” DEQ, Louisiana.gov

I wonder how many drops of from “thousands of barrels” of oil will escape into the ground table and impact the fresh water of the region. I also wonder if pollution standards will quietly be changed to accommodate new levels of contamination; rendering once unsafe levels as “safe.”

There is already a campaign underway to establish that radiation is good for you.

-Peter Terezakis. NYC 2013

“No cause for immediate concern” ?

(CNN) -- Six tanks at the Hanford Nuclear Reservation in southeast Washington state are leaking radioactive waste, the governor said Friday, calling the news "disturbing" even as he insisted there are "no immediate health risks." "News of six leaking tanks at Hanford raises serious questions about integrity of all single tanks," Gov. Jay Inslee said Friday afternoon on Twitter.

On the shore of Washington state’s Columbia River, six radioactive containment ponds are leaking in Hanford, the largest nuclear superfund site in the United States.

53 million US gallons (200,000 m3) of high-level radioactive waste,[5] an additional 25 million cubic feet (710,000 m3) of solid radioactive waste, 200 square miles (520 km2) of contaminated groundwater beneath the site[6] and occasional discoveries of undocumented contaminations

According to Washington State Governor Jay Inslee there are, “no immediate health risks from leaking nuclear waste.”   The half-life of two isotopes of weapons grade Plutonium are 14.4 and 24,000 years there is plenty of risk and reason to be concerned.  With all respect to the Governor,  “are you kidding me/us?”  Or is it just that since nothing can be done to safely dispose of these man-made isotopes, the sound bite is to assume an existential position and simply not worry as nothing can be done to put the genie back in the bottle?

What is to happen with San Onofre, an antiquated nuclear facility, sitting on a fault line, on the Pacific coast, mid-way between Los Angeles and San Diego?  Will the eventual leaking of nuclear waste from their holding tanks also not become,  “cause for immediate concern?”   And speaking of “holding tanks” with the half-life of Plutonium being what it is, how long are these tanks supposed to remain in place and to what end?

Not to attempt to assign responsibility to the Public Utility Commission or the multi-national energy corporation Sempra Energy, but nuclear power would simply not exist if it were not for the federal subsidies which it has historically received, as well as the shift of construction costs and operating risks from investors to taxpayers and ratepayers, burdening them with an array of risks including cost overruns, defaults to accidents, and nuclear waste management.

 

 

SCANT TESTING FOR ARCTIC BLOWOUT CAPPING SYSTEM

“SCANT TESTING FOR ARCTIC BLOWOUT CAPPING SYSTEM — Safety Agency Can Produce Only One Page of Notes to Demonstrate Cap Reliability

Washington, DC — The key system for preventing a repeat of the massive Gulf of Mexico blowout in the sensitive waters of the Arctic underwent only partial and cursory testing with no independent analysis of the results, according to Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility (PEER), which obtained the federal testing data. As a result, federal overseers are again completely relying upon industry assurances of safety as Royal Dutch Shell prepares to begin drilling this week in the remote Chukchi Sea.

In response to a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request for all “records pertaining to results of Shell oil company’s testing of its well-head capping stack that would be used in response to a well-head blowout in its Arctic drilling program,” the Bureau of Safety & Environmental Enforcement (BSEE is an arm of the Interior Department, formerly within the Minerals Management Service) could produce only one document – a one-page set of notes. This slim production belied the agency’s claim in press statements that it had conducted “comprehensive” testing to meet “rigorous new standards.”
The field-testing took place over less than two hours in Puget Sound on June 25th and 26th and involved only two BSEE officials and Shell. The first day, they lowered the capping stack to a depth of 200 feet, but did not try to attach it to a simulated wellhead and blowout preventer (BOP), as would be necessary in a real-world blowout.”
Read full article at Peer.org

Thinking of Fracking, GMOs, and other things….